From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-21049-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 20718 invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2002 07:26:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 20704 invoked by uid 71); 11 Aug 2002 07:26:09 -0000
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 02:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020811072609.20703.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>
Subject: Re: preprocessor/7558: preprocessor option -MM has change semantic
Reply-To: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>
X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00220.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR preprocessor/7558; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>
To: boehme@informatik.hu-berlin.de
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, debian-gcc@lists.debian.org,
	"Martin v. Loewis" <martin@v.loewis.de>
Subject: Re: preprocessor/7558: preprocessor option -MM has change semantic
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 08:19:09 +0100

 Martin,
 
 If it's a system header, why are you lying to the compiler?
 
 Maybe a real-life example and not "a.h" would help.
 
 Neil.