From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-21063-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 32685 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2002 15:06:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32656 invoked by uid 71); 12 Aug 2002 15:06:01 -0000
Resent-Date: 12 Aug 2002 15:06:01 -0000
Resent-Message-ID: <20020812150601.32654.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
Resent-From: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org (GNATS Filer)
Resent-To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Resent-Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, java-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Resent-Reply-To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nirkko@dkf6.unibe.ch
Received: (qmail 27844 invoked by uid 61); 12 Aug 2002 14:56:12 -0000
Message-Id: <20020812145612.27843.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:56:00 -0000
From: nirkko@dkf6.unibe.ch
Reply-To: nirkko@dkf6.unibe.ch
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
X-Send-Pr-Version: gnatsweb-2.9.3 (1.1.1.1.2.31)
Subject: libgcj/7578: gcc-3.1.1 libjava regression: tons of new FAILS on check
X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00234.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>


>Number:         7578
>Category:       libgcj
>Synopsis:       gcc-3.1.1 libjava regression: tons of new FAILS on check
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Mon Aug 12 08:06:01 PDT 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     nirkko@dkf6.unibe.ch
>Release:        gcc-3.1.1
>Organization:
>Environment:
Sun SPARC Solaris 2.6 (and Linux, and others...)
>Description:
after gcc bootstrap:
whereas in gcc-3.1, gmake -k check results
for libjava were in the 'usual' range, now
in gcc-3.1.1 there are tons of unexpected FAILS,
which seems a regression to me. Looking at your
"successful builds" webpage, this seems so also
on other platforms (for example, Linux-i86).
Do tests FAIL because of assembler warnings,
and newer assemblers (gas-2.13) issue more of them?
or was there a major change in the testsuite or
in libjava code?
>How-To-Repeat:
take gcc-3.1 and gcc-3.1.1
'gmake bootstrap'  and  'gmake -k check'  each of them.
compare results.
>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: