From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-21206-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7155 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2002 12:26:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7133 invoked by uid 71); 19 Aug 2002 12:26:04 -0000
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 05:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020819122604.7127.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Subject: Re: optimization/7632: gcc 3.2 for PowerPC: instruction scheduling ignores dependency in variable asignments
Reply-To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00377.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/7632; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
To: Horst.Lehser@hightec-rt.com
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/7632: gcc 3.2 for PowerPC: instruction scheduling ignores dependency in variable asignments
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 08:22:57 -0400

 It is an invalid use of pointers conversion of ISO C aka aliasing rules.
 
 Thanks,
 Andrew Pinski
 
 On Monday, August 19, 2002, at 07:49 , Horst.Lehser@hightec-
 rt.com wrote:
 
 > double a;
 > double foo(void)
 > {
 > 	((int *)&a)[1] += 5;
 > 	return;
 > }