From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15427 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2002 14:36:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15371 invoked by uid 71); 20 Aug 2002 14:36:03 -0000 Resent-Date: 20 Aug 2002 14:36:03 -0000 Resent-Message-ID: <20020820143603.15369.qmail@sources.redhat.com> Resent-From: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Resent-Reply-To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, ac131313@redhat.com Received: (qmail 14510 invoked by uid 61); 20 Aug 2002 14:30:18 -0000 Message-Id: <20020820143018.14509.qmail@sources.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 07:46:00 -0000 From: ac131313@redhat.com Reply-To: ac131313@redhat.com To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org X-Send-Pr-Version: gnatsweb-2.9.3 (1.1.1.1.2.31) Subject: c/7653: Define -W strictly in terms of other warning flags X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00405.txt.bz2 List-Id: >Number: 7653 >Category: c >Synopsis: Define -W strictly in terms of other warning flags >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: unassigned >State: open >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: net >Arrival-Date: Tue Aug 20 07:36:02 PDT 2002 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: ac131313@redhat.com >Release: unknown-1.0 >Organization: >Environment: >Description: Assuming I'm reading the current manual correctly, the -W option is a combination of the following existing options: o -Wreturn-type o -Wsign-compare o -Wmissing-braces And also: o An automatic variable can be clobered by a setjmp/longjmp. o An expression statement has no side effects. o ``static'' doesn't come first. o (x<=y ? 1 : 0) <= z} vs {x<=y<=z} o A function returning ``const''. o Missing initalizers for an aggregate. o The -Wunused side effect. Suggest defining -W strictly in terms of other -W options. More -W options would need to be added. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: