public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@baldric.uwo.ca> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, Subject: Re: c/7661: gcc-3.0 optimization bug on debian GNULinux on x86 with very simple program Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 18:06:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20020820234602.3382.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) The following reply was made to PR c/7661; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@baldric.uwo.ca> To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu> Cc: Thomas Deselaers <thomas@deselaers.de>, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, debian-gcc@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: c/7661: gcc-3.0 optimization bug on debian GNULinux on x86 with very simple program Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 19:39:36 -0400 > I think this program should not terminate at all because i will > always be one greater than oldi. > I think gcc3.0 has a problem with no optimization then but since > there is later version that works gcc 3.1.1, upgrade. > > Thanks, > Andrew Pinski > Agreed. Infact it doesn't terminate on all the systems I've tried (3). But for the sake of presenting a test case :) --- Test System: Dell XPS-T 450Mhz PIII (Debian testing/unstable) --- Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.0.4/specs Configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,objc --prefix=/usr --infodir=/share/info --mandir=/share/man --enable-shared --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --with-system-zlib --enable-long-long --enable-nls --without-included-gettext --disable-checking --enable-threads=posix --enable-java-gc=boehm --with-cpp-install-dir=bin --enable-objc-gc i386-linux Thread model: posix gcc version 3.0.4 --- carlos@systemhalted:~$ cat test.c main() { int i=0; int oldi=0;; while(++i>oldi) oldi=i; return oldi; } carlos@systemhalted:~$ gcc-3.0 -O0 -o test test.c carlos@systemhalted:~$ ./test (Attach gdb, look at stuff, it's not stopping) ^C carlos@systemhalted:~$ gcc-3.0 -o test test.c carlos@systemhalted:~$ ./test (Attach gdb, look at stuff, it's not stopping) ^C --- Maybe you've been bad to your gcc ;) In the optimized case (-O9) I see: 080483f8 <main>: 80483f8: 55 push %ebp 80483f9: 89 e5 mov %esp,%ebp 80483fb: 83 ec 08 sub $0x8,%esp 80483fe: 83 e4 f0 and $0xfffffff0,%esp 8048401: 8d 76 00 lea 0x0(%esi),%esi 8048404: eb fe jmp 8048404 <main+0xc> 8048406: 90 nop 8048407: 90 nop Which never terminates... and gcc knew it. If there were some examples of gcc-3.0 mucking up optimizations... this isn't it. c.
next reply other threads:[~2002-08-20 23:46 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2002-08-20 18:06 Carlos O'Donell [this message] -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2002-08-20 14:06 Martin Sebor 2002-08-20 11:46 Andrew Pinski 2002-08-20 10:16 Thomas Deselaers
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20020820234602.3382.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=carlos@baldric.uwo.ca \ --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).