From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9350 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2002 20:25:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9330 invoked by uid 61); 21 Aug 2002 20:25:51 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 17:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020821202551.9329.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: dl256@columbia.edu, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: nathan@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: nathan@gcc.gnu.org, dl256@columbia.edu, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/7678: implicity typename deprecated inheritance problem X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00447.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: implicity typename deprecated inheritance problem State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: nathan State-Changed-When: Wed Aug 21 13:25:50 2002 State-Changed-Why: yes, our interpretation is correct. consider: when instantiated the base class might be an explicit specialization where size_type is something else. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7678