From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32284 invoked by alias); 5 Sep 2002 09:26:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32269 invoked by uid 71); 5 Sep 2002 09:26:06 -0000 Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2002 02:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020905092606.32267.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: ljrittle@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Gabriel Dos Reis Subject: Re: libstdc++/7805: Test 18_support/numeric_limits.cc execution fails on cygwin Reply-To: Gabriel Dos Reis X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00074.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/7805; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Gabriel Dos Reis To: ljrittle@gcc.gnu.org Cc: David.Billinghurst@riotinto.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, ljrittle@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/7805: Test 18_support/numeric_limits.cc execution fails on cygwin Date: 05 Sep 2002 11:11:47 +0200 ljrittle@gcc.gnu.org writes: | Since this is | also an ix86 machine, it doesn't surprise me. Consider a | patch to use the looser check specialization for your | platform (as long as you can rationalize it), pre-approved. Please, NO, don't do that. I explained the reasons of the failure in another message which should by now be recorded in audit trail. -- Gaby