From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-21615-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13835 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 2002 19:06:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13817 invoked by uid 71); 8 Sep 2002 19:06:01 -0000
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2002 12:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020908190601.13816.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Subject: Re: c++/7858: g++ rejects legal code (regression from gcc 3.*)
Reply-To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00121.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/7858; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
To: Peter Schmid <schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/7858: g++ rejects legal code (regression from gcc 3.*)
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 15:05:00 -0400

 I do not think this is valid code.
 To make it valid try:
 
 template <class _Operation>
 inline binder1st<_Operation>
 bind1st(const _Operation& __fn, const typename 
 _Operation::first_argument_type& __x)
 {
    return binder1st<_Operation>(__fn, __x);
 }
 
 The problem was that g++ before a week ago accepted invalid code in 
 which
 you could take a pointer to a casted variable which is invalid.
 
 Thanks,
 Andrew Pinski