From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-21621-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9338 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 2002 23:26:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9324 invoked by uid 71); 8 Sep 2002 23:26:00 -0000
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2002 16:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020908232600.9323.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Subject: Re: c++/7858: g++ rejects legal code (regression from gcc 3.*)
Reply-To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00127.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/7858; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
To: Peter Schmid <schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Cc: <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>, <bkoz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: c++/7858: g++ rejects legal code (regression from gcc 3.*)
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 19:24:18 -0400

 Actually my argument is against using STLport because gcc now includes 
 a full c++ standard library there is no use for STLPort under gcc 3.3.
 And it looks like you can get rid of the static cast and it should work.
 
 I showed how to work around the "bug" in boost from the testcase.
 
 Thanks,
 Andrew Pinski