From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-21646-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31447 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2002 19:36:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31433 invoked by uid 71); 9 Sep 2002 19:36:01 -0000
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 12:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020909193601.31432.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it>
Subject: Re: c++/7858: g++ rejects legal code (regression from gcc 3.*)
Reply-To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it>
X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00152.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/7858; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,  gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,  gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, 
 nobody@gcc.gnu.org,  schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/7858: g++ rejects legal code (regression from gcc 3.*)
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 21:25:59 +0200

 Hi,
 
 I believe that the PR can be considered a duplicate of c++/7828. Do you 
 agree?
 
 Thanks, Paolo.
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7858