From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-21647-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10330 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2002 19:56:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10316 invoked by uid 71); 9 Sep 2002 19:56:02 -0000
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 12:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020909195602.10315.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Peter Schmid <schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Subject: Re: c++/7858: g++ rejects legal code (regression from gcc 3.*)
Reply-To: Peter Schmid <schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de>
X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00153.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/7858; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Peter Schmid <schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de>
To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it>
Cc: <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>, <gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>, <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
        <nobody@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: c++/7858: g++ rejects legal code (regression from gcc 3.*)
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 21:47:19 +0200 (CEST)

 On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Paolo Carlini wrote:
 
 > Hi,
 >
 > I believe that the PR can be considered a duplicate of c++/7828. Do you
 > agree?
 >
 > Thanks, Paolo.
 >
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7858
 >
 >
 
 The problem reported is nearly identical to PR c++/7868. The difference is
 that  PR c++/7848 is also a libstdc++-v3 related bugreport. If Andrew
 Pinski's  analysis is true the casts included in the binder code in the
 libstdc++ header file bits/stl_function.h have to be removed.
 
 Hope this helps,
 
 Peter Schmid