From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6499 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2002 08:55:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6481 invoked by uid 61); 10 Sep 2002 08:55:39 -0000 Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 01:55:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020910085539.6480.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, moretti@fe.infn.it, toon@gcc.gnu.org From: toon@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: toon@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, moretti@fe.infn.it, toon@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: fortran/7278: g77 "bug"; the executable misbehave X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00166.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: g77 "bug"; the executable misbehave State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->feedback State-Changed-By: toon State-Changed-When: Tue Sep 10 01:55:38 2002 State-Changed-Why: It is believed that a recent fix by Jan Hubicka to correct the compilation of SPECfp's sixtrack might also have fixed the problem you are seeing. Could you try the latest snapshot (20020909) and see if that is indeed the case ? Thanks. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7278