From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-21697-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25379 invoked by alias); 12 Sep 2002 09:36:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25362 invoked by uid 71); 12 Sep 2002 09:36:04 -0000
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 02:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020912093604.25361.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Raul Tabasso <tabasso@tabasoft.it>
Subject: Re: c/7888: wrong code produced by GCC 3.1
Reply-To: Raul Tabasso <tabasso@tabasoft.it>
X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00203.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c/7888; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Raul Tabasso <tabasso@tabasoft.it>
To: nathan@gcc.gnu.org,
 gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
 gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
 nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
 tabasso@tabasoft.it,
 gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c/7888: wrong code produced by GCC 3.1
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 11:31:26 +0200

 The processor tested is a Motorola PowerPC G4 but this is not =20
 significative since the code is generated for any of the PowerPC =20
 processor familly.
 
 Mercoled=EC, 11 set 2002, alle 18:01 Europe/Rome, nathan@gcc.gnu.org ha =20=
 
 scritto:
 
 > Synopsis: wrong code produced by GCC 3.1
 >
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
 > State-Changed-By: nathan
 > State-Changed-When: Wed Sep 11 09:01:00 2002
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >     what processor?
 >
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=3Dview%20audit-=20
 > trail&database=3Dgcc&pr=3D7888
 >