From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-21707-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23315 invoked by alias); 13 Sep 2002 00:26:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23301 invoked by uid 71); 13 Sep 2002 00:26:00 -0000
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 17:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020913002600.23300.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: c/6326: gcc compile illegal code
Reply-To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00213.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c/6326; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
To: <gdr@gcc.gnu.org>,  <act.kronoz@activenetwork.it>, 
     <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,  <ptrebuc@sophia.inria.fr>, 
     <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c/6326: gcc compile illegal code
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 01:20:38 +0100 (BST)

 On 10 Sep 2002 gdr@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
 
 > Synopsis: gcc compile illegal code
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: closed->open
 > State-Changed-By: gdr
 > State-Changed-When: Tue Sep 10 16:33:59 2002
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >     Closed by mistake.
 >     Andrew Pinski's analysis is not applicable since the part he
 >     is reading concerns function declaration that is not a definition
 >     and we're precisely in a case where that is irrelevant.
 >     
 >     Furthermore, Neil's analysis alos isn't applicable.
 
 The PR is incorrect and based on a misunderstanding of C.  I gave my
 analysis in <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-05/msg00046.html>.
 
 -- 
 Joseph S. Myers
 jsm28@cam.ac.uk