From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23726 invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2002 12:29:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23707 invoked by uid 61); 15 Sep 2002 12:29:22 -0000 Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 05:29:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020915122922.23706.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, schalkc@ntaba.co.za From: nathan@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: nathan@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, schalkc@ntaba.co.za, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/6337: Fails to distinguish between operator[](int) and operator T*(). X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00394.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Fails to distinguish between operator[](int) and operator T*(). State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: nathan State-Changed-When: Sun Sep 15 05:29:22 2002 State-Changed-Why: not a bug. The choice is between int & operator[] (1, a.operator int *()); int & a.operator[] (unsigned (1)) which are ambiguous http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6337