From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-22010-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 32062 invoked by alias); 17 Sep 2002 18:26:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32042 invoked by uid 71); 17 Sep 2002 18:26:02 -0000
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 11:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020917182602.32041.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Martin Sebor <sebor@roguewave.com>
Subject: Re: c++/7841: gcc accepts illegal member function syntax for template classes
Reply-To: Martin Sebor <sebor@roguewave.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00516.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/7841; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Martin Sebor <sebor@roguewave.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
	bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/7841: gcc accepts illegal member function syntax for template classes
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 12:15:08 -0600

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7841
 
 14.6.1, p1 talks about references to unqualfied names of templates,
 which inevitably excludes declarations that appear outside of the
 class template definition. Also, examples are not normative :)
 
 The test case is ill-formed according to 14.2, p2 and must be
 diagnosed by a conforming implementation.
 
 Regards
 Martin