From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16139 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2002 18:26:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16076 invoked by uid 71); 27 Sep 2002 18:26:02 -0000 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 11:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020927182602.16075.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: aph@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Adam Megacz Subject: Re: java/8063: Compiler chokes with -O3, "fatal error reading class for second time" Reply-To: Adam Megacz X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00756.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR java/8063; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Adam Megacz To: Andrew Haley Cc: Adam Megacz , tromey@redhat.com, aph@gcc.gnu.org, adam@xwt.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, java-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: java/8063: Compiler chokes with -O3, "fatal error reading class for second time" Date: 27 Sep 2002 11:26:08 -0700 Andrew Haley writes: > Are you totally sure that this was a clean build from clean source? Yes. Also, keep in mind that we've found discrepancies in compiler behavior before based on what compiler was used to compile the compiler. Specifically, in a previous thread, people who used 2.95 to build 3.x got crashes, while people who used 3.1 to build 3.x (such as you, Andrew) did not get crashes: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2002-09/msg00114.html - a -- "Through your rags I see your vanity" -- Socrates