From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25440 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2002 18:36:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25399 invoked by uid 71); 27 Sep 2002 18:36:02 -0000 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 11:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020927183602.25398.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: aph@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Andrew Haley Subject: Re: java/8063: Compiler chokes with -O3, "fatal error reading class for second time" Reply-To: Andrew Haley X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00758.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR java/8063; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Andrew Haley To: Adam Megacz Cc: tromey@redhat.com, aph@gcc.gnu.org, adam@xwt.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, java-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: java/8063: Compiler chokes with -O3, "fatal error reading class for second time" Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 19:30:14 +0100 (BST) Adam Megacz writes: > > Andrew Haley writes: > > Are you totally sure that this was a clean build from clean source? > > Yes. > > Also, keep in mind that we've found discrepancies in compiler behavior > before based on what compiler was used to compile the compiler. > Specifically, in a previous thread, people who used 2.95 to build 3.x > got crashes, while people who used 3.1 to build 3.x (such as you, > Andrew) did not get crashes: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2002-09/msg00114.html Well, we don't know that was the cause of the problem. It might equally have been system libraries, for example. Andrew.