From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13393 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2002 20:56:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13377 invoked by uid 71); 27 Sep 2002 20:56:03 -0000 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 13:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020927205603.13376.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Mark Mitchell Subject: Re: preprocessor/8055: CPP0 segfault on FreeBSD + PATCH Reply-To: Mark Mitchell X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00761.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR preprocessor/8055; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mark Mitchell To: Zack Weinberg , "ak03@gte.com" , Neil Booth Cc: "gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org" , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: preprocessor/8055: CPP0 segfault on FreeBSD + PATCH Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 13:50:20 -0700 --On Friday, September 27, 2002 12:50:09 PM -0700 Zack Weinberg wrote: > Thank you for this bug report. I've reproduced the problem, and > confirm your analysis. I'm going to do a complete bootstrap+test > cycle on a slight modification of your patch (see below) and will > apply to mainline if successful. I think we need to figure out if this is a regression before applying it to the branch. Just in case. If it is a regression, it's fine. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com