From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12220 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2002 22:56:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12202 invoked by uid 71); 27 Sep 2002 22:56:02 -0000 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 15:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020927225602.12197.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Mark Mitchell Subject: Re: preprocessor/8055: CPP0 segfault on FreeBSD + PATCH Reply-To: Mark Mitchell X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00765.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR preprocessor/8055; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mark Mitchell To: Zack Weinberg Cc: "ak03@gte.com" , Neil Booth , "gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org" , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: preprocessor/8055: CPP0 segfault on FreeBSD + PATCH Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 15:45:49 -0700 > I can say that I reproduced the bug under laboratory conditions using > top of trunk and top of 3.2 (nee 3.1) branch, and that the same > procedure fails to provoke a bug using the top of the 3.0 branch, > where the memory allocation code is different. I think that's good enough. Check it in. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com