From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11082 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2002 20:36:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11057 invoked by uid 61); 29 Sep 2002 20:36:26 -0000 Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 13:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020929203626.11056.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, moretti@fe.infn.it, toon@gcc.gnu.org, toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl From: sayle@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: sayle@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, moretti@fe.infn.it, toon@gcc.gnu.org, toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: fortran/7278: g77 "bug"; the executable misbehave X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00836.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: g77 "bug"; the executable misbehave State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed State-Changed-By: sayle State-Changed-When: Sun Sep 29 13:36:25 2002 State-Changed-Why: I've confirmed that this PR has been fixed, probably (as Toon suggests) by Jan's recent fixes. I checked that both t.f and t1.f did indeed produce different results between -O2 and -O2 -fno-automatic using g77 v3.1. Repeating the tests with current mainline however produces the same (correct) output. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7278