From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-22374-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 24825 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2002 21:06:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 24801 invoked by uid 71); 30 Sep 2002 21:06:05 -0000
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 14:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020930210605.24794.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Christophe de Vienne <cdevienne@alphacent.com>
Subject: Re: c++/8100: a valid operator definition is rejected.
Reply-To: Christophe de Vienne <cdevienne@alphacent.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00880.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/8100; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Christophe de Vienne <cdevienne@alphacent.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
	nobody@gcc.gnu.org, cdevienne@alphacent.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/8100: a valid operator definition is rejected.
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 23:09:48 +0200

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8100
 
 Hi,
 
 I'm the repoter of this (actualy not) bug.
 
 After trying all most stupid things possible, it appeared that a 
 #include <ostream>
 was missing (I couldn't imagine such a simple thing in a code from Pavel Krauz 
 but still).
 
 Sorry to have created this useless bug report.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Christophe de Vienne