From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3303 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2002 21:25:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3275 invoked by uid 61); 30 Sep 2002 21:25:48 -0000 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 14:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020930212548.3274.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: andreaha-bugs@lexx.infeline.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: rth@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: rth@gcc.gnu.org, andreaha-bugs@lexx.infeline.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/8093: Wrong warning by gcc suggests adding dead code to end of function X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00883.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Wrong warning by gcc suggests adding dead code to end of function State-Changed-From-To: open->suspended State-Changed-By: rth State-Changed-When: Mon Sep 30 14:25:47 2002 State-Changed-Why: This will probably never be fixed. Completely general value propagation is too compile-time expensive. Use a switch. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8093