From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29150 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2002 23:36:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29127 invoked by uid 71); 30 Sep 2002 23:36:01 -0000 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 16:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020930233601.29126.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: target/8087: sparc-sun-solaris2.7 C testsuite failures in execute/20020720-1.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64 Reply-To: "David S. Miller" X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00894.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/8087; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "David S. Miller" To: rth@redhat.com Cc: davem@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, jakub@redhat.com, roger@eyesopen.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: target/8087: sparc-sun-solaris2.7 C testsuite failures in execute/20020720-1.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 16:22:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Richard Henderson Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 16:24:21 -0700 Not really. Zero is easy: fzeros %f0 I know this :-) but these instructions are TARGET_VIS only. Although it may seem like it, sparc64 != ultrasparc and I know quite a few people turning -mvis off in the work they are doing for other sparc64 processors. I.e. this is all bogus for COMPARE targets. The whole set FCC bit, or just the "1" case?