From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-22402-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7935 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2002 16:26:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7917 invoked by uid 71); 1 Oct 2002 16:26:00 -0000
Resent-Date: 1 Oct 2002 16:26:00 -0000
Resent-Message-ID: <20021001162600.7916.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
Resent-From: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org (GNATS Filer)
Resent-Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Resent-Reply-To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, dyatchkov@mcst.ru
Received: (qmail 3627 invoked by uid 61); 1 Oct 2002 16:18:06 -0000
Message-Id: <20021001161806.3626.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 09:26:00 -0000
From: dyatchkov@mcst.ru
Reply-To: dyatchkov@mcst.ru
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
X-Send-Pr-Version: gnatsweb-2.9.3 (1.1.1.1.2.31)
Subject: optimization/8110: GCC 3.2: wrong code optimization with -O2
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>


>Number:         8110
>Category:       optimization
>Synopsis:       GCC 3.2: wrong code optimization with -O2
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          wrong-code
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Tue Oct 01 09:26:00 PDT 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Ilia Dyatchkov
>Release:        3.2
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: SunOS 5.8 (Solaris 8)
Architecture: sparc
host: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
build: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
target: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
configured with: /home/username/src/gcc-3.2/configure --prefix=/home/username/usr --disable-multilib --enable-languages=c,c++,f77 --norecursion
>Description:
cc1 in spec's CINT2000 176.gcc aborts when it made by gcc 3.2 with -O2 (or higher) option. The test works correctly when we use gcc with lower optimization. The test also works after compiling by gcc 2.95.2  with -Os.
It aborts at the end of expand_expr function (in expr.c) because temp=0 (in what way?).
>How-To-Repeat:
Configure SPEC CPU2000 with following settings

ext		= compsys
tune		= base
iterations	= 1
size		= test
OPTIMIZE	= -O2 // or higher

and run runspec.

Or you can make $(SPEC)/benchspec/CINT2000/176.gcc/src/ and then run (spec)cc1 for compiling $(SPEC)/benchspec/CINT2000/176.gcc/data/train/input/cp-decl.i.
>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: