From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4821 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2002 05:14:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4772 invoked by uid 61); 2 Oct 2002 05:14:02 -0000 Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 22:14:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021002051402.4771.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: eric.norum@usask.ca, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: davem@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: davem@gcc.gnu.org, eric.norum@usask.ca, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/4367: Sparc atomicity.h routines can lock up on some OS. X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00036.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Sparc atomicity.h routines can lock up on some OS. State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->feedback State-Changed-By: davem State-Changed-When: Tue Oct 1 22:14:02 2002 State-Changed-Why: I can add the IRQ disabling code for v7 if people tell me what an appropriate ifdef check would be. Would it work if either of __rtems___ __vxWorkd__ or __embedded__ is set? Can I be guarenteed that I will be running in privileged mode if one of those ifdefs are set? http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=4367