From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12508 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2002 06:36:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12494 invoked by uid 71); 3 Oct 2002 06:36:00 -0000 Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 23:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021003063600.12493.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Christian_J=F6nsson?= Subject: Re: libstdc++/7995: ICE in gcc cvs trunk 20020921 when compiling libstdc++-v3/src/complex_io.cc on sparc64-linux Reply-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Christian_J=F6nsson?= X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00083.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/7995; it has been noted by GNATS. From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Christian_J=F6nsson?= To: "David S. Miller" Cc: davem@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/7995: ICE in gcc cvs trunk 20020921 when compiling libstdc++-v3/src/complex_io.cc on sparc64-linux Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 08:35:06 +0200 On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 04:41:14PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > > gcc-2.96 is not able to produce reliable 64-bit binaries on sparc. > That is why you are seeing these problems. ok, even though it's just the first stage compilation that is done using gcc-2.96 and that there are no comparison problems detected between stages two and three? if som i'll build a gcc-3.2.1 cvs branch with just the c language, install it, and use that as bootstrap stage one compiler. is that what you'd suggest? Cheers, /ChJ