From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20673 invoked by alias); 4 Oct 2002 18:46:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20649 invoked by uid 71); 4 Oct 2002 18:46:04 -0000 Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 11:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021004184604.20648.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Jason Merrill Subject: Re: c++/8067: g++ 3.2 internal error: Segmentation fault Reply-To: Jason Merrill X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00162.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/8067; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jason Merrill To: Pop =?iso-8859-1?q?S=E9bastian?= Cc: Reichelt , gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, y_fedor@ciam.ru, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/8067: g++ 3.2 internal error: Segmentation fault Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 10:44:24 +0100 Thanks, but your patch is just a workaround; the problem is that we think we're dealing with a variable declared in the for-init-stmt, but we really aren't. Either we need to add more tests to the enclosing if, or we need to change current_binding_level when pushing __PRETTY_FUNCTION__. Jason