From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-22556-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 20712 invoked by alias); 4 Oct 2002 18:46:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 20669 invoked by uid 71); 4 Oct 2002 18:46:05 -0000
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 11:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021004184605.20664.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: zack@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>
Subject: Re: preprocessor/8055: CPP0 segfault on FreeBSD + PATCH
Reply-To: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00163.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR preprocessor/8055; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
Cc: ak03@gte.com, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>,
	gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: preprocessor/8055: CPP0 segfault on FreeBSD + PATCH
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 19:42:00 +0100

 Zack Weinberg wrote:-
 
 > Thank you for this bug report.  I've reproduced the problem, and
 > confirm your analysis.  I'm going to do a complete bootstrap+test
 > cycle on a slight modification of your patch (see below) and will
 > apply to mainline if successful.
 
 Thanks Zack.  Catching up on 5 figures of email...
 
 Neil.