From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4157 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2002 09:28:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4134 invoked by uid 61); 5 Oct 2002 09:28:05 -0000 Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 02:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021005092805.4133.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, philippe_ribet@hotmail.com From: neil@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: neil@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, philippe_ribet@hotmail.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: preprocessor/8139: Bad new INT64_C macro X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00173.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Bad new INT64_C macro State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: neil State-Changed-When: Sat Oct 5 02:28:04 2002 State-Changed-Why: You should probably add a U to the relevant numbers. Anyway, not a GCC bug. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8139