From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7811 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2002 09:46:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7788 invoked by uid 71); 5 Oct 2002 09:46:02 -0000 Resent-Date: 5 Oct 2002 09:46:02 -0000 Resent-Message-ID: <20021005094602.7787.qmail@sources.redhat.com> Resent-From: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Resent-Reply-To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, casteyde.christian@free.fr Received: (qmail 7706 invoked by uid 61); 5 Oct 2002 09:45:19 -0000 Message-Id: <20021005094519.7705.qmail@sources.redhat.com> Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 02:46:00 -0000 From: casteyde.christian@free.fr Reply-To: casteyde.christian@free.fr To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org X-Send-Pr-Version: gnatsweb-2.9.3 (1.1.1.1.2.31) Subject: bootstrap/8151: GCC 3.2 fails to bootstrap with glib 2.3 X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00175.txt.bz2 List-Id: >Number: 8151 >Category: bootstrap >Synopsis: GCC 3.2 fails to bootstrap with glib 2.3 >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: unassigned >State: open >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: net >Arrival-Date: Sat Oct 05 02:46:01 PDT 2002 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: casteyde.christian@free.fr >Release: 3.2 >Organization: >Environment: >Description: Linux 2.4.19/glibc 2.3/make 3.80/binutils 2.13 (test of integration) Actually, gcc did compile itself, but failed to build the libstdc++. Failure was "unknown __newlocale" in libstdc++ build, certainly due to glibc 2.3 header change. Quite difficult to find stable couple of glibc/gcc that compiles each other: glibc 2.2.5 fails with gcc 3.2 (since 3.1.1 actually), glibc 2.2.6 would but is not out, glibc 2.3 succeeded but broke gcc now. Hence it would be nice (if this is a gcc bug) to be fixed for gcc 3.2.1 (last couple that worked was 2.2.5 / 3.1). >How-To-Repeat: I guess building libstdc++ would suffice. >Fix: Don't known if it is a regression from glibc 2.3. Maybe this bug report is not in the right place. >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: