From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26846 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2002 19:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26832 invoked by uid 71); 5 Oct 2002 19:06:01 -0000 Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 12:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021005190601.26831.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Sven Verdoolaege Subject: Re: optimization/7002: gcc -fPIC incorrect optimization on i586 Reply-To: Sven Verdoolaege X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00201.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/7002; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sven Verdoolaege To: hubicka@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: optimization/7002: gcc -fPIC incorrect optimization on i586 Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 21:01:33 +0200 On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 05:29:47PM -0000, hubicka@gcc.gnu.org wrote: > Synopsis: gcc -fPIC incorrect optimization on i586 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: hubicka > State-Changed-When: Thu Oct 3 10:29:46 2002 > State-Changed-Why: > The code produced by 3.2 branch looks entirely different now and testcase is dificult to analyze. Is it still broken? > It's difficult to say. The particular snippet of code shown in the bug report seems to get compiled correctly, but something in the same file still gets compiled incorrectly with both -fPIC and -O2 and not with just -fPIC. I'll submit a new bug report when I figure out where the problem moved. skimo