From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-22606-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 30395 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2002 09:16:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30358 invoked by uid 71); 6 Oct 2002 09:16:01 -0000
Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 02:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021006091601.30356.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: ada/5905: Nag message code considered harmful
Reply-To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00214.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR ada/5905; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
To: <bosch@gcc.gnu.org>,  <fw@deneb.enyo.de>,  <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>, 
     <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: ada/5905: Nag message code considered harmful
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 10:13:19 +0100 (BST)

 On 5 Oct 2002 bosch@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
 
 >     This is fixed in current sources.
 
 No, it isn't; it's only been fixed on the 3.1 branch, and is on the
 possibly incomplete list of such patches in ada/6919.
 
 -- 
 Joseph S. Myers
 jsm28@cam.ac.uk