From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-22612-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15294 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2002 14:26:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15279 invoked by uid 71); 6 Oct 2002 14:26:00 -0000
Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 07:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021006142600.15278.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
Subject: Re: ada/5905: Nag message code considered harmful
Reply-To: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00219.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR ada/5905; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
Cc: <bosch@gcc.gnu.org>, <fw@deneb.enyo.de>, <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: ada/5905: Nag message code considered harmful
Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 14:28:30 +0200

 "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> writes:
 
 > On 5 Oct 2002 bosch@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
 >
 >>     This is fixed in current sources.
 >
 > No, it isn't; it's only been fixed on the 3.1 branch, and is on the
 > possibly incomplete list of such patches in ada/6919.
 
 I suggest to reopen the PR,
 
 Andreas
 -- 
  Andreas Jaeger
   SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
    private aj@arthur.inka.de
     http://www.suse.de/~aj