public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
Subject: Re: c++/8067: g++ 3.2 internal error: Segmentation fault
Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 12:16:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021006191600.26538.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1219 bytes --]

The following reply was made to PR c++/8067; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
To: Pop Sébastian <pop@gauvain.u-strasbg.fr>
Cc: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>, Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>,
   gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, y_fedor@ciam.ru, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/8067: g++ 3.2 internal error: Segmentation fault
Date: 06 Oct 2002 21:10:01 +0200

 Pop Sébastian <pop@gauvain.u-strasbg.fr> writes:
 
 | Hi Jason,
 | 
 | On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 10:44:24AM +0100, Jason Merrill wrote:
 | > Thanks, but your patch is just a workaround; the problem is that we think
 | > we're dealing with a variable declared in the for-init-stmt, but we really
 | > aren't.  
 | Ok, so we have to teach G++ that __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ is not a local declaration 
 | in the FOR_INIT.
 
 More specifically, we have to teach the front-end about gracious
 handling of similar erroneous constructs in the for-init-statement.
 
 | What about the following patch for solving the PR following the first suggestion?
 
 Does it handle similar constructs where you replace
 __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ with another id-expression?  I'm under the
 impression that it does not.
 
 -- Gaby


             reply	other threads:[~2002-10-06 19:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-06 12:16 Gabriel Dos Reis [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-23 17:14 mmitchel
2002-10-23 15:06 mmitchel
2002-10-07 14:26 Pop Sébastian
2002-10-06 12:06 Pop Sébastian
2002-10-04 11:46 Jason Merrill
2002-09-30 13:06 Pop Sébastian
2002-09-30 10:36 Pop Sébastian
2002-09-30  9:56 Reichelt
2002-09-28  6:32 lerdsuwa
2002-09-27  0:06 y_fedor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021006191600.26538.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=gdr@integrable-solutions.net \
    --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).