From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29074 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2002 03:05:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29054 invoked by uid 61); 7 Oct 2002 03:05:04 -0000 Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 20:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021007030504.29053.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: 86251-quiet@bugs.debian.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: rth@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: rth@gcc.gnu.org, 86251-quiet@bugs.debian.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/3511: Inlined strlen() could be smarter X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00230.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Inlined strlen() could be smarter State-Changed-From-To: open->suspended State-Changed-By: rth State-Changed-When: Sun Oct 6 20:05:04 2002 State-Changed-Why: I doubt this will ever be handled. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=3511