From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30619 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2002 03:08:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30600 invoked by uid 61); 7 Oct 2002 03:08:19 -0000 Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 20:08:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021007030819.30599.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, k_satoda@f2.dion.ne.jp, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: rth@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: rth@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, k_satoda@f2.dion.ne.jp, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/4131: Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section? X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00233.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section? State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: rth State-Changed-When: Sun Oct 6 20:08:19 2002 State-Changed-Why: Because it has a non-trivial constructor. This could probably still be optimized, but it's up to the front end to tell us that; changed to category c++. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=4131