From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-22629-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28961 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2002 04:36:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28931 invoked by uid 71); 7 Oct 2002 04:36:01 -0000
Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 21:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021007043601.28930.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Subject: Re: optimization/7269: Inlining may not eliminate unnecessary tests and branches.
Reply-To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00236.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/7269; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, anamax@earthlink.net,
   gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/7269: Inlining may not eliminate unnecessary tests and branches.
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 21:35:24 -0700

 Do you have a simple sample which shows this?
 
 Thanks,
 Andrew Pinski
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- 
 trail&database=gcc&pr=7269