From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-22693-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8166 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2002 19:36:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8153 invoked by uid 71); 8 Oct 2002 19:36:00 -0000
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 12:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021008193600.8152.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: gerald@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Janis Johnson <janis187@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: web/8168: What is the preferred means of reporting bugs?
Reply-To: Janis Johnson <janis187@us.ibm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00300.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR web/8168; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Janis Johnson <janis187@us.ibm.com>
To: pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: web/8168: What is the preferred means of reporting bugs?
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 12:29:36 -0700

 I changed gnats.html without noticing that the heading is "gccbug and
 gnatsweb", and that gccbug is mentioned later in the page, in the part
 about including large test cases.
 
 Do we want to continue to document gccbug, or should those references
 to it be removed?
 
 Janis