From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6448 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2002 22:06:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6370 invoked by uid 71); 8 Oct 2002 22:06:02 -0000 Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 15:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021008220602.6369.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pop_S=E9bastian?= Subject: Re: c++/8134: ICE in force_store_init_value on legal code Reply-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pop_S=E9bastian?= X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00309.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/8134; it has been noted by GNATS. From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pop_S=E9bastian?= To: Gabriel Dos Reis Cc: lerdsuwa@gcc.gnu.org, alvaro@rentec.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, georgeh@rentec.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/8134: ICE in force_store_init_value on legal code Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 00:05:38 +0200 On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 11:58:35PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > Pop Sébastian writes: > > | I can reproduce the bug with > | gcc version 3.2.1 20020924 (Debian prerelease) > | > | The bug is not present in: > | gcc version 3.0.4 > | > | nor in the latest version in CVS: > | version gcc 3.3 20021007 (experimental) > | > | Seems like the bug was a duplicate of another bug fixed in the mainline. > | I suggest to close this PR. > > don't you have a GNATS account? > not yet... > Can you determine which patch fixes this PR? It would be helpful if > it could be backported to branch, > This remembers me something... in typeck2.c I will try to retrieve it. > -- Gaby