From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28065 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2002 23:55:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28041 invoked by uid 61); 9 Oct 2002 23:55:06 -0000 Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 16:55:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021009235506.28040.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, janis187@us.ibm.com, janis@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: janis@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: janis@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, janis187@us.ibm.com, janis@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/6368: ia64 bad code for LAPACK with -O2 -funroll-all-loops X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00347.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: ia64 bad code for LAPACK with -O2 -funroll-all-loops Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->janis Responsible-Changed-By: janis Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Oct 9 16:55:06 2002 Responsible-Changed-Why: ready to close State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: janis State-Changed-When: Wed Oct 9 16:55:06 2002 State-Changed-Why: The problem no longer occurs with the mainline or the 3.2 branch as of 20021008. I have no idea which patch fixed it. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6368