From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32195 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2002 03:26:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32181 invoked by uid 71); 10 Oct 2002 03:26:00 -0000 Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 20:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021010032600.32180.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Nathanael Nerode Subject: Re: bootstrap/6638: m68k-linux bootstrap comparision failure (3.1-20020508) Reply-To: Nathanael Nerode X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00353.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/6638; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Nathanael Nerode To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, doko@cs.tu-berlin.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: bootstrap/6638: m68k-linux bootstrap comparision failure (3.1-20020508) Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 23:16:37 -0400 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6638 According to the report, the bootstrap was configured for i386-linux. If you were really running on m68k-linux, it's no wonder it failed, and it isn't a bug in gcc (possibly in config.guess, though!). If this is really i386-linux, why was it reported for m68k-linux? --Nathanael