From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20232 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2002 17:46:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20195 invoked by uid 71); 10 Oct 2002 17:46:03 -0000 Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 10:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021010174603.20194.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Ian Ollmann Subject: Re: optimization/8049: SSE unaligned vector stores crash with -O0 Reply-To: Ian Ollmann X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00384.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/8049; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ian Ollmann To: hubicka@gcc.gnu.org, , , Cc: Subject: Re: optimization/8049: SSE unaligned vector stores crash with -O0 Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 10:46:47 -0700 On 10 Oct 2002 hubicka@gcc.gnu.org wrote: > Synopsis: SSE unaligned vector stores crash with -O0 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: hubicka > State-Changed-When: Thu Oct 10 09:45:59 2002 > State-Changed-Why: > It is runtime bug to not align stack properly for main. > It will go away with runtime compiled using gcc 3.2 or can be workarounded by avoiding vector stuff in main. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8049 I see this in functions that are not main(). Didn't I provide an example of one? Ian --------------------------------------------------- Ian Ollmann, Ph.D. iano@cco.caltech.edu ---------------------------------------------------