From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-22815-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 30169 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2002 21:16:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30153 invoked by uid 71); 10 Oct 2002 21:16:02 -0000
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 14:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021010211602.30152.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
Subject: Re: c++/8172: undefined reference to operator+ for string
Reply-To: Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00422.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/8172; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gunneyb@llnl.gov, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
        nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/8172: undefined reference to operator+ for string
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 23:58:05 +0200

 Hi,
 
 the bug affects all versions of gcc from 3.0 till now.
 The code compiles fine on 2.95.x, however (checked on
 i686-pc-linux-gnu and mips-sgi-irix6.5).
 Thus, it is a regression and should be marked high priority.
 
 Greetings,
 Volker Reichelt
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8172