public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Belov, Eugeny" <Eugeny_Belov@stl.sarov.ru>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
Subject: Re: libstdc++/8195: n-th algorithm (STL) doesn`t work properly
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 08:46:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021011154601.29050.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/8195; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Belov, Eugeny" <Eugeny_Belov@stl.sarov.ru>
To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libstdc++/8195: n-th algorithm (STL) doesn`t work properly
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 19:42:01 +0400

     Hello Wolfgang
 
   I am understanding that the principle of this algorithm (in simple 
 terms) is to divide the sequence into 2 parts like this:
 smaller elements , n-th element, bigger elements,  and in the general 
 case both parts can be unsorted.
   But the real problem in this case is that smaller elements comes after 
 n-th ("n-th" is the integer with value 12 - the biggiest of all other 
 elements), i.e. the sequence after using the nth_element() is "4 4 5 6 6 
 6 9 _12_ 8 10" and in this case I think the n-th algorithm 
 implementation make a mistake.
 
 With best regards.
 Eugeny.
 
 
 Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
 
 >This is not a bug, so may be closed.
 >
 >nth_element does not sort the _entire_ array, it only makes sure that the 
 >elements before the nth-pointer are smaller, and the ones behind that are 
 >larger than the element pointed to by nth (the second argument). It makes 
 >no guarantees that each of these two parts of the entire range is sorted 
 >itself.
 >
 >Regards
 >  Wolfgang
 >
 >-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 >Wolfgang Bangerth              email:           bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu
 >                               www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth
 >
 


             reply	other threads:[~2002-10-11 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-11  8:46 Belov, Eugeny [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-11 16:12 paolo
2002-10-11  8:56 Wolfgang Bangerth
2002-10-11  7:46 Wolfgang Bangerth
2002-10-11  4:16 johnb

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021011154601.29050.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=eugeny_belov@stl.sarov.ru \
    --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).