From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-22877-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15144 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2002 20:26:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15126 invoked by uid 71); 11 Oct 2002 20:26:01 -0000
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 13:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021011202601.15125.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: c/7344: performance regression on huge case statements
Reply-To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00484.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c/7344; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
Cc: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,
   rschiele@uni-mannheim.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
   gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c/7344: performance regression on huge case statements
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 13:16:52 -0700

 On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 09:46:25PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
 > Did you noticed that there is another patch sent to same thread?
 
 No I didn't.  I'll go look again.
 
 
 r~