From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16477 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2002 23:19:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16457 invoked by uid 61); 11 Oct 2002 23:19:04 -0000 Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 16:19:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021011231904.16456.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: Pierre.van.de.Laar_AT_Philips.com@sources.redhat.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: rth@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: rth@gcc.gnu.org, Pierre.van.de.Laar_AT_Philips.com@sources.redhat.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/8175: different behaviour with different optimization levels X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00495.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: different behaviour with different optimization levels State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: rth State-Changed-When: Fri Oct 11 16:19:04 2002 State-Changed-Why: Not a bug. Undefined behaviour: two modifications with no sequence point. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8175