From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-22889-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 19890 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2002 23:26:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19877 invoked by uid 71); 11 Oct 2002 23:26:01 -0000
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 16:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021011232601.19876.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: rth@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Glen Nakamura <glen@imodulo.com>
Subject: Re: optimization/8165: builtin string functions SEGV on alpha-pc-linux-gnu at -O2
Reply-To: Glen Nakamura <glen@imodulo.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00496.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/8165; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Glen Nakamura <glen@imodulo.com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,
	gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/8165: builtin string functions SEGV on alpha-pc-linux-gnu at -O2
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 13:17:21 -1000

 On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:44:48PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
 >         * gcse.c (adjust_libcall_notes): Also adjust notes for INSN.
 
 Okay, but isn't this redundant to the following code in try_replace_reg ():
 
 static int
 try_replace_reg (from, to, insn)
      rtx from, to, insn;
 {
   rtx note = find_reg_equal_equiv_note (insn);
   ...
   /* If there is already a NOTE, update the expression in it with our
      replacement.  */
   else if (note != 0)
     XEXP (note, 0) = simplify_replace_rtx (XEXP (note, 0), from, to);
 
 
 Does try_replace_reg still need the above code?
 
 - glen