From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23910 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2002 00:56:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23892 invoked by uid 71); 12 Oct 2002 00:56:01 -0000 Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 17:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021012005601.23891.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: rth@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Richard Henderson Subject: Re: optimization/8165: builtin string functions SEGV on alpha-pc-linux-gnu at -O2 Reply-To: Richard Henderson X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00505.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/8165; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Richard Henderson To: Glen Nakamura Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/8165: builtin string functions SEGV on alpha-pc-linux-gnu at -O2 Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 17:51:43 -0700 On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:17:21PM -1000, Glen Nakamura wrote: > Does try_replace_reg still need the above code? I completely missed that. Sigh. I guess your original patch is probably correct. I was focused so much on the LO_SUM/HIGH simplification that I missed the fact that we were failing to process the internal regs of the LO_SUM at all. r~