From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16912 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2002 04:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16894 invoked by uid 71); 12 Oct 2002 04:06:01 -0000 Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 21:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021012040601.16892.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: middle-end/7617: shared libgcc binary incompatibility on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Reply-To: Daniel Jacobowitz X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00510.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR middle-end/7617; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: morey@astech.org Cc: nbryant@allegientsystems.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: middle-end/7617: shared libgcc binary incompatibility on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 00:02:57 -0400 On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 08:10:43PM +0700, morey@astech.org wrote: > I have been experiencing the same problems. I have been using binutils-2.13. After extensive playing around I have noticed > > a few things. If you compile a simple program that is dynamically linked with libgcc_s.so it will crash in __init with a > > SIGSEV. However, if it is compiled with -static the program will run fine. I then rebuilt gcc and had it use the solaris ld > > and as and how a program the dynamically linked with libgcc_s.so will run fine. It appears to be a problem related to binutils-2.13. > > I will try an older version and see if I can track down what exactly is causing the problem. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7617 Get a binutils CVS head snapshot. This is recently fixed and we'll be releasing a fixed 2.13.1 in a couple of weeks hopefully. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer